Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | BlueHost Review


Main page

Censorship in the land of
Freedom of Speech!


The US government warned TV networks that Osama might be passing secret information in his messages, and that they should be careful about broadcasting them.

At best, Osama bin Laden's message is propaganda...” the US government said.

Do you think our government is truly trying to protect us? Or, is the US government is worried that more people might agree with Osama that the USA should quit meddling in the Middle East?

America Online is also censoring messages!

America Online has message boards for its members where we can post messages. The message boards are for mainly for entertainment; ie, nobody goes there to learn about the world. Because children can access these boards, they have censors to delete certain messages.

I never paid much attention to the message boards before the attack at the World Trade center. After the attack I looked at the messages to see what sort of reaction the people had. Almost everybody was agreeing that we should immediately begin a slaughter of the Arabs.

I began posting messages that had a link to my "Revenge" article. I noticed that some of these messages disappeared from certain message boards. I also noticed a few other people complaining that their messages disappeared.

One time I was reading a message that had a link about a Navy ship that was reportedly attacked by Israel in 1969. There were several responses to this particular message. As I was looking at the responses they started to disappear. A few moments later the entire message was gone. The censors had obviously taken it out while I was looking at it.

The link he posted was: http://208.56.153.48/jim/ussliberty/

The person who posted that link mentioned that we must read it quickly before the censors take it away. He complained that he had posted it before and it disappeared.

Here is another site about this incident:
http://home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/

Nobody censors nonsense; they only censor the truth.

The censors on America Online are trying to control the opinions of the American people by removing messages that criticize Israel. The censors allow anti-Israeli messages to remain on the board if the messages are stupid, but some boards delete my messages within minutes, and they delete the message about the Navy ship within minutes.

The censors appear to be doing this on their own rather than because the AOL management told them to. The reason I say this is because some boards let the messages remain. It simply depends on who the censor is.

Obviously, some censors consider the article about the Navy ship and my documents to be dangerous. This makes me wonder if perhaps the censors know that the accusations about Israel sinking that Navy ship are true.

The message boards on America Online are full of nonsensical remarks. Censors normally do not bother to censor nonsense. Their censoring of that Navy ship article gives it some credibility.

Does this have any importance to you?

You may think that because the message boards belong to America Online that the censors can do as they please. You may think this is a trivial incident of no importance to you.

However, it shows that there are people who will take it upon themselves to violate our laws of freedom of speech in order to promote Israel. There may be other people censoring other messages in order to promote some other cause. Altogether, there may be a lot of people manipulating the information that we are exposed to.

What if these people were counting ballots?

During the last presidential election, the results in Florida were so close that the Democrats wanted to count the ballots a second time, and then a third time. They counted several times, and each time Al Gore would pick up a few more votes.

What if some of the people who were counting those ballots were like the censors for America Online? Is it possible that some of them would deliberately discard ballots for George Bush? Or were people discarding ballots for Al Gore? Or were both groups trying to cheat, with the end result that they cancelled each other's cheating?

Invalid ballots are common. However, the outcome of an election should not change if the ballots are counted a second time because some of the invalid ballots should be for George Bush and some should be for Al Gore, and they should be in the same percentage as the valid ballots.

The Bush/Gore election was said to be different than the others. Specifically, the Florida Democrats complained that the design of their ballot was causing most of the invalid ballots to be for Al Gore. The Gore supporters also complained that many of their voters in the Palm Beach area were extremely old and/or suffering from mental disorders. Therefore, they claimed, by counting the ballots again, Al Gore would win the election.

My opinion is that neither Al Gore nor George Bush is qualified for president. I would also say that anybody who cannot vote properly should not be voting. Furthermore, when an election is so close that counting the ballots a second time can change the winner, the election should be held again. If the voters cannot decide who should be president, we should hold another election with different candidates. We should find a president that has more support.

How much manipulation is occurring?

Getting back to my point, as I watched messages vanish from the message boards at America Online, I had to wonder what would happen if these people were counting ballots. If a person will censor messages in order to manipulate your opinions, can you trust him to count ballots?

I also wondered how many of these people were involved in producing television news, newspaper articles, or magazines. How many of these people are government officials, or United Nations employees? Since they try to manipulate the opinions of people on America Online, wouldn't they also try to manipulate the opinions of the TV viewers, the government, and the United Nations?

Everybody has their particular biases, so when a person writes an article it will be a reflection of his personal opinions. However, what is happening at America Online is beyond a personal bias; it is deliberate censoring of information in an attempt to manipulate. When this sort of censoring occurs in Russia, the Americans jump on a pedestal, insult the Russians, and brag that we have freedom of speech.

The difference between Communist Russia and America is that the Russian government would manipulate the information, whereas the American government has no control over information. In America the manipulation is done by individual citizens and groups of citizens. While this is better than allowing the government to censor information, we should not tolerate it. A person who has influence over information should have to follow higher standards of behavior.

The USS Liberty

The unanswered question is if Israel attacked the USS Liberty on purpose, why did they do it? The USS Liberty did not have any way to defend itself; it was not a war ship, and there were no military ships nearby. It was an information gathering ship. Why attack a non-military ship that is all alone?

To summarize one speculation, Israel was conducting a mass murder of Arabs and the USS Liberty was almost within visual site of it. Rather than get caught doing what they condemn Nazis for doing, the Israelis attacked the ship, destroying the ship and killing many of the people on it.

Check out that link about the USS Liberty. If the Arabs had attacked a Navy ship, would you forget the incident if the Arabs told you:

"Ooops! That was an accident! Gosh, that ship looks so much an Israeli war ship! Sorry!"

Any US military man (especially a Navy dude) who believes the Arabs maintain a fleet of military ships that look like the non-military US ships as well wear a sign on his back:

I am an American moron!

Please, Israel, do not take advantage of me!


The Lavon Affair

Here is a link to an article that describes a terrorist attack by Egyptians that turned out to be conducted by Israelis in an attempt to make it appear as if the Egyptians had done it.

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891/lavon_hirst.html
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891/lavon_hirst.html

Note: You can also search google.com for "Lavon+Affair"

The Deir Yassin massacre

Here is a massacre the Jews like to forget so that they can repeat it again and again:
http://www.deiryassin.org/

And here is a very unusual Zionist who not only remembers the massacre but also feels the massacre was wrong.
http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/dy/

Most Americans are easy to manipulate

You may wonder how Israelis could think it is possible to manipulate Americans. The reason is that most Americans rarely make an effort to learn about an issue.

You, who read documents on the Internet, are in a tiny minority. Most Americans only watch TV or listen to rumors; they will not make any effort to read different or controversial opinions.



How to determine if a message is censored

(for people using America Online)

The easiest way is to have two screen names.

Step 1) Post a message under name #1. Give it a minute to get on the board.

Step 2) Switch to name #2 and look at the messages.
Your message should be visible at the top of list. Don't read any, though, or if you do you have to remember to mark it as “unread”. It is easier not to read anything with name #2; just look at the subjects.

Step 3) Come back an hour later using name #2 and the message should still be visible, but new messages will be at the top. If the message has vanished, they censored it.

The censoring is more active on the message boards that are grouped under the title "Breaking News Discussions". Here is a message they love to censor at the board called "Ashcroft urges stiffer penalties for terrorists":

Subject: How does Ashcroft define "terrorism"?

How can Ashcroft ask for stiffer penalties for “terrorists” when the definition of a “terrorist” changes over the years?

The Zionists were referred to as “terrorists” prior to 1948, and the Arabs were "defending their land".

Today, however, the Israelis are "pioneers" or “settlers”, and the Arabs are terrorists.

America's fight on terrorism doesn't make any sense. We could describe Israel as a terrorist nation.

Learn more here: http://members.aol.com/erichuf/Revenge.html

Here is another they censor:

Subject: Why did Israel sink the USS Liberty?

Here is a link about a Navy ship that was attacked by Israel in 1969. Israel claims it was an "accident". But James Ennes, the lieutenant on the bridge of the USS Liberty on the day of the attack, believes it was deliberate: http://208.56.153.48/jim/ussliberty/