Just so you do not accuse me of criticizing only Jews, I would like to point out that I realize lots of Christians are also a nuisance to society.

This page of The Christian Science Monitor web site summarizes Israel's history:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1026/p10s1-uspo.html

Here is their entire entry for 1947:

1947. UN partitions Palestine into two states - one for Jews, one for Palestinians.

The Christians who read this are certain to get the impression that the United Nations created Israel.

Have the people of the Christian Science Monitor been so deceived by Jews that they do not understand how Israel was created? Or, are these Christians also trying to deceive us in order to promote Israel?

I have met more than one Christian who supports both Israel and the killing of Arabs for biblical reasons that only a person with mental defects would consider intelligent. Therefore, I would not be surprised to learn that some Christians are distorting history in order to promote Israel and encourage the hatred of Arabs.

I have also met Christians who are afraid the Arabs will get control of what they consider to be the birthplace of Jesus. What do those Christians think the Arabs will do with the land that Jesus lived on? Do they have visions of the Arabs digging up the dirt, hauling it to the ocean, and then using the hole as a garbage dump?

The Arabs have been living in Palestine for thousands of years. They have not destroyed the birthplace of Jesus yet, so what makes the Christians worry that the Arabs will do something to it in the future? Do Christians in other nations have these same neurotic fears?

I have also met Christians (one had a PhD in geology) who believe that Muslims deserve to die because their religion is disgusting and the Arabs are an inferior race.

Don't forget people such as Jerry Falwell. Many of these Christians are struggling to get rid of the theory of evolution, plate tectonics, and who knows how many other scientific fields. What would happen if those Christians got control of our newspapers, government, schools, or television news networks? How would they be any better than letting the Zionists get control?

Christians may be our bigger problem

In other words, Christians may be a significant problem – maybe even a bigger problem than the Jews.

Do American universities lie, also?

1936-39 Palestinian nationalist uprising against Britain. Britain proposes partition of Palestine and expulsion of 250,000 Palestinians.

This entry tells us that the Palestinians attacked the British for a "nationalist uprising". What exactly does that mean? Did the Palestinians have the audacity to demand Palestine be their own nation?

The world refers to those people as Palestinians because Palestine has been their home for thousands of years! The Zionists are the intruders.

Furthermore, the population of Palestine in 1936 was very small, so a quarter million Palestinians was a significant number of people. Where would Britain deport that many Palestinians to?

The most likely explanation is that the Jews proposed deporting the Palestinians, not the British. And the Jews are trying to make the Palestinians appear to be violent savages who are trying to take Palestine away from the Jews.

1944-47 Jewish-British War. Jewish groups in Palestine try to expel Britain. Mainstream Jewish fighters under David Ben Gurion are called Hagana. They later become the Israeli army. Two separate military groups (Irgun Zvai Leumi led by Menachem Begin and Lehi or the Stern Gang led by Yitzhak Shamir) resort to assassination and bombings. Many British soldiers and Arab civilians are killed.

In this entry the university admits that the Jews attacked their British friends, but it does not refer to these Israelis as terrorists or murderers. Nor does the university point out that the Jews turned against their own friends; that the Jews cannot be trusted.

The University of Michigan is either trying to deceive us in order to promote Israel, or they are as uneducated about world history as the average person. Either way, the teachers should be told to find another job.

American schools are not educating students about world history. Rather, they provide Zionist propaganda.

Jews have turned against their friends before

Furthermore, they have been accused of conducting a terrorist attack in an attempt to fool the world into believing that it was conducted by Arabs. Have you heard about the Lavon Affair:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891/lavon_hirst.html

What is so shocking about the possibility that the Jews today are behaving the same as they have all throughout history?

Do Jews also manipulate the award ceremonies?

Jews win a lot of awards, such as the Academy Awards and Nobel prizes. I often hear my fellow Americans praising the Jews for being more intelligent and creative than the rest of us. But are the Jews really earning these awards? Or are they manipulating the process, as they manipulated President Truman and news reports?

In 1982 Steven Spielberg received the United Nation's Medal Of Peace. What did Spielberg do for the world that was so great that all nations of the world believed he should have a prize for peace?

Supposedly, his movies bring peace to the world. But how does the making of movies that are at the intellectual level of a 10 year-old child bring peace to the world? He has been making movies for many years now; in what way has the world become more peaceful because of his movies?

My personal opinion is that some Jews simply pushed and manipulated the people at the United Nations into giving him that award. Spielberg aint done nothing to bring peace to the world.

What would make the United Nations even consider giving him an award for peace? I wonder if Spielberg was the person who brought up the issue. Spielberg may have hired some people to make the suggestion at the United Nations and then push the UN into giving him this award.

If I were to select a Hollywood celebrity for a world-wide peace award, I would give it to Bill Cosby. I think he has done more to improve race relations than anybody else simply by creating a pleasant image for black Americans.

Most people are suckers for praise

From 1948 onward many Jews filled the news reports with articles which praised the Americans for saving the Jews from the Nazis and helping Israel. The Americans were praised for their compassion, their love, and their generosity. The Americans were told that the innocent, generous, loving, peaceful Jews were abused all throughout history and especially during the Nazi era.

I remember hearing that the reason the Jews were victims of every society for thousands of years is because they were too peaceful to fight back! The Jews were too peaceful to defend themselves.

I also heard that the Jews were so peaceful that they could not kill Jesus; instead, they had to convince the Romans to kill Jesus.

Will there ever be a point at which the Americans tell the Jews to shut up with this nonsense?

I doubt it. Most Americans love the praise of how they are heroes for defending the helpless, peaceful, non-violent Jews against the evil anti-Semites and Nazis.

Politicians also use praise to manipulate people

The voters never get tired of such praise; they never tell the politicians to either discuss something intelligent or shut up. The American voters have an insatiable craving for compliments.

People such as myself, who criticize Americans, will never get elected because we would be labeled as cruel and insulting. The most successful politicians say whatever the people want to hear and tell American people that we are the "Greatest People in the World". People like me are told to shut up!

Businesses also praise us

The American people never tell these businesses to behave in a serious manner. Rather, they prefer to shop at these businesses.

Notice that the praise in advertisements that are targeting the “common people” are very blatant, whereas the advertisements that are targeting scientists and engineers are much more serious and subtle. The reason for this difference is that businesses have noticed that they can get away with treating the average person as a moron to exploit, whereas scientists expect be treated as intelligent human beings.

What effect does successful manipulation have on an author?

I think the effect would be that you would eventually look at your customers as gullible, ignorant morons who have very low standards for news reports. I think you would eventually lose respect for them.

Compare that to a situation in which you are writing news reports for a group of people who catch every mistake you make and who complain whenever you show bias in your reports. What effect would those people have on you? I think the effect would be that you would look at them as intelligent, observant people who have very high standards for news reports.

The Jews have been lying to the American people about how Israel got established, what Zionism is, who the Palestinians are, and lots of other issues, and this has been occurring for decades. What effect does this successful manipulation have on Jewish authors? What do the Jewish authors say to one another at dinner? Here is a possible conversation:

Irving: Can you believe how gullible the Americans are? Most actually believe that the United Nations created Israel!

Marvin: That's nothing! Last week I wrote a story about how Israeli “pioneers” killed some Palestinians. I had recently seen a John Wayne movie, and I thought it would be funny to call the Israelis “pioneers”. I was tempted to refer to the Palestinians as “Indians”, but at the last minute I decided I might be pushing my luck!

Irving: I wonder how far we could go. What if we told these morons that America actually belongs to us Jews? We could tell them that our ancestors lived here 4000 years ago!

“We, the Jewish people, control America”

on October 3, 2001 an Israeli radio station reported that Prime Minister Sharon and his foreign minister Peres got into an argument at a weekly meeting of Israeli government officials. The American government at this time was complaining that Israel must stop the fighting. Peres told Sharon that if they continued fighting they risked upsetting the Americans. Sharon reportedly yelled back at Peres:

"I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it."

Peres and other government officials scolded Sharon for making such remarks in public because "it would cause us a public relations disaster."

Sure, it is interesting that an Israeli government official would make such a remark in public, but the reaction of the other officials is more interesting. They could have responded with:

"What a jerk! We do not control America! I propose this moron be removed from our government!"

But instead they told him:

"Be quiet, Sharon! Do not make such remarks in public! The Americans will hear you! This could create a public relations disaster!"

It has been a few months since Sharon made that remark, but what effect has it had on the relationship between Israel and America? Did his remark create a public relations disaster? Of course not. The Americans have been Israeli pawns for decades, and there is no sign anything will change.

Imagine an argument breaking out in the American congress. Imagine Dick Cheney yelling at a Senator :

"I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about British pressure on America, we, the American people, control Britain, and the British know it. "

Would you think that perhaps that Cheney has just had another stroke? Of course. The reason is because we do not control the British government. But who in the Israeli government considered Sharon to be suffering from a stroke? Their only objection was that he made the remark in public.

How could Sharon be so cocky as to make that remark in public?

Sharon is certainly aware that there are several Web sites that expose the explosion of the World Trade Centers. When he said that the Americans know that the Jews control America, he may have been referring to those people, as well as to the government officials who are frequently pushed around by Jews. The average American does not believe that the Jews control America, so he would not have been referring to the average American.

Henry Ford complained about Zionism in 1920

After looking around on the Internet, I found a document he wrote in May of 1921 with the interesting title: Will Jewish Zionism Bring Armageddon?

In the book he complains about the Zionists attempt to take control of Palestine, and the possible influence the Jews had over World War 1.

Henry Ford was aware in 1920 that the Zionist movement was a serious problem to the world. In the 80 years since he wrote that article, his fears have been proven correct. The Zionist movement has grown tremendously, and as it grew, the fighting in the Middle east has become increasingly severe.

Furthermore, Israel is exploiting us for money and weapons, and worst of all, Israel is dragging us into their fights. The World Trade Center attack is just one example. There have been other bombings, hijackings, and killings in America, Britain, and other nations.

What will happen in then next 80 years? You do know that Israel has nuclear weapons now, don't you? And that Iran is supposedly only a year or two away from making them?

The vast majority of Americans ignored Henry Ford in 1920, and the vast majority will ignore me in 2002. Perhaps 80 years from now somebody will complain about Israel, and then they will notice that people made the exact same complaints many generations earlier. Will the world ever stand up to Israel?

I have also noticed David Duke has written lots of these same complaints. One example is:
http://www.duke.org/awakening/chapter15_01.html

I suppose there are thousands of other people complaining about Israel, but we are all ignored.

No wonder Prime Minister Sharon felt he could openly boast that the Jews control America! He is correct; he may as well boast about it! I guess I should be thankful that Sharon is not making us learn Hebrew or give up pork...or is that coming up in a few years?

More about how the Jews manipulate

The following is a sentence from an article in the 1965 The World Book encyclopedia, which I grew up with. This comes from the article on “Palestine”:

In 1917 the great British scientist-statesman and Zionist, Chaim Weizmann, persuaded the British government to issue a statement favoring the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine.

Notice that the author tries to make Weizmann appear to be somebody special. He put the words “great British scientist-statesman” in front of his name in order to impress us.

This, by itself, is not going to manipulate anybody, but wait until you have seen what they end up doing within the Balfour Declaration before you dismiss it.

Next notice that Weizmann persuaded the government to "issue a statement". This is a vague sequence of words that makes something of no real value appear to be very important. However, unless you have seen the Balfour document, you will not understand what I'm talking about. So, before I discuss the Balfour document any further, click this link and look at it.
http://www.wzo.org.il/home/movement/balfour2.htm

I know what you are thinking, "Oh no, he expects me to read pages and pages of legal mumbo jumbo."

No, the Balfour document contains only a few sentences. You must look at an actual photograph of the document to realize that the Jews have turned a worthless piece of paper into something important.

Unfortunately, that is a JPG image of the file, so it is a bit difficult to read the words. So just take a glance at this image so that you can see what a joke is was. The text of the document is below.

I would describe the Balfour Declaration as a “personal letter” that was given to the Jews in order to appease them. The British government was not committing anything to the Zionist cause. It was more of a public-relations stunt.

In 1917 printing was difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, so government documents tended to have a crude appearance compared to documents of today. But if we are going to call that Balfour document a "Declaration" and elevate it to the position of an important government document, then we should do the same for every similar public-relations document.

Be very careful what you sign

The Balfour document shows that government officials must be very careful what they write on paper. A remark that seems meaningless, such as “Good luck with your plans to create Israel”, might be turned into “an Official Declaration signed by a government officer”.

It is even more dangerous for a government official to hint that he may offer help, which is what the Balfour Declaration did. A person who is given such a document may come back later and demand that the “promises” be kept.

Jews excel at exaggeration

The Jews then used the Balfour Declaration to intimidate and impress citizens, reporters, and government officials. They would essentially hold the document up and say,

"This is the Balfour Declaration! The British government has officially agreed to the idea of a national homeland for Jews. This official Balfour Declaration, written by the great British scientist-statesman Weizmann, the stupendous, the highly educated, and amazing Weizmann, has been officially signed and agreed to by the highest levels of the British government. Who are you to ignore the Balfour Declaration? Who are you to ignore the British government? Who are you to ignore the great British scientist-statesman Weizmann!"

Most people would never bother to look closely at the Balfour Declaration. Instead they would assume it must be an important government document, and that it was supported by the British government for a good reason.

Returning to The World Book Encyclopedia, we find the following sentence:

After the war, the League of Nations ratified, or approved, the Balfour declaration.

In this sentence we learn that the League of Nations approved the declaration. What does it mean when they “approved” of the declaration? What actually happened at the League of Nations? My guess is that some Jews pushed the people at the League of Nations into signing it, and eventually everybody get tired of their whining, and so they agreed to sign it since it didn't actually commit them to anything.

However, once the League of Nations signed the document, the Jews could tell people that it was an official document of the League of Nations. This would intimidate even more people.

Returning to The World Book Encyclopedia, we find the following sentence:

In 1936 the Arabs started guerrilla fighting against the Jews in Palestine.

This is an example of how the Jews have twisted our history to suit Isreal. The Jews try to make the Arabs look like monsters. We could describe the Zionists as doing the “guerrilla fighting.” And we could say the Arabs were struggling to “defend themselves” from the “Zionist terrorists”.

Further in the encyclopedia article we read:

"After full investigations, the United Nations decided to divide Palestine into two independent states, a Jewish state and an Arab state."

That statement is an outright lie. First, there were no “full investigations”. The author is trying to make it appear as if the United Nations is a group of intelligent people who carefully analyzed the situation in Palestine. In reality, the United nations consists of representatives who do what they are told, and most of them seem to get their job due to political favors. Their discussions are not very intelligent, either.

Secondly, the representatives discussed the issue of the fighting in Palestine, but the nations never agreed to do anything. Actually, as I mentioned previously, Britain and nine other nations decided to avoid voting on the proposal to divide Palestine. In other words, the United Nations did not “decide to divide Palestine”; rather, they decided to ignore the situation and move on to other issues.

Thirdly, the United Nations did not have the authority to create nations. The most that the United Nations could have done was “suggest” a division of Palestine.

The Jews (and some Christians!) are lying in our history books, encyclopedias, magazines, and television news. Actually, I would describe what they do as a crime. The Jews are not merely making innocent mistakes; rather, they are lying in a deliberate attempt to deceive us.

American encyclopedias, newspapers, TV news reports, and magazines have been warped by Jews to such an extent that most Americans believe that the United Nations created Israel and that Arabs are trying to take Israel away from the Jews.

The Balfour document is held up again in 1948

the year 1897 the First Zionist Congress, inspired by Theodor Herzl's vision of the Jewish State, proclaimed the right of the Jewish people to national revival in their own country. This right was acknowledged by the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, and re-affirmed by the mandate of the League of Nations, which gave explicit international recognition to the historic connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and their right to reconstitute their National Home.

That is an attempt to deceive and intimidate people into thinking that both Britain and the League of Nations approved the creation of Israel. I am surprised they didn't also mention “the great British scientist-statesman, the amazing Weizmann”.

Also in their Declaration Of Independence we find:

On November 29, 1947, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a Resolution requiring the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine. The General Assembly caloled upon the inhabitants of the country to take all the necessary steps on their part to put the plan into effect. This recognition by the United Nations of the right of the Jewish people to establish their independent State is unassailable.

That is an attempt to deceive and intimidate people into believing the United Nations was “...requiring the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine”. The United Nations never required the establishment of Israel, nor does the United Nations have the authority to require such a thing.

The first Balfour document was rejected

Original version, July 1917

1. His Majesty's Government accepts the principle that Palestine should be reconstituted as the national home of the Jewish people.

2. His Majesty's Government will use its best endeavors to secure the achievement of this object and will discuss the necessary methods and means with the Zionist Organization.

In this first version the Jews ask Britain to give them Palestine. You can certainly understand why the British would never agree to sign that version.

It is interesting to consider that in 1917 Britain did not control Palestine, yet the Jews were asking Britain to “reconstitute” Palestine as a national home for the Jews. Were the Jews merely hoping that Britain would drive the Turks out of Palestine, and then acquire control over Palestine? Or were the Jews influencing the course of WW1?

More about the Balfour document is here:
http://www.wzo.org.il/home/movement/balfour.htm

In the first draft of the Balfour document the Zionists had the gall to demand Britain give Palestine to the Jews. Then Jews asked for something a bit little less selfish. Eventually the British were presented with a sentence that so vague and meaningless that the British were willing to agree to it. Of course, they should have held out for two or three more versions until the sentence was 100% meaningless.

This goes to show you that when somebody is pressuring you into doing something you do not want to do, try to resist them a bit longer than you normally would.

You will see this pushy behavior among the Jews on a frequent basis. The Jews start off demanding something ridiculous. When you refuse, they will reduce their demands and then push some more. If you still refuse, they will reduce their demands again and push you some more.

There is a method of selling a product that is referred to as "bartering". With this process, products do not have fixed prices. Instead, the buyer and seller discuss prices until they find something they both can agree upon.

Bartering is common in primitive societies, but it is disappearing in modern societies. Bartering is a waste of time. It is easier to put prices on products, put the products on the shelves or in a catalog, and let consumers pick the ones they want. Bartering is only practical in primitive societies.

You will notice that some Jews use this bartering practice in American retail stores in which there are fixed prices for products. Rather than accept the fixed-price, they find a sales clerk or the store manager, and then waste his time as they try to push him into reducing the price. Some people refer to this process as “being Jew'ed down”.

Some people who emigrate to America from primitive nations grew up with bartering, and they are so accustomed to it that they often do it here in America without being aware that they are annoying us. However, the Jews are not coming to America from Third World nations. They barter with us simply because they want us to do more for them.

Who is fooled by the Jews?

The people most likely to be fooled by lies and deception are people who assume everybody is honest, and people who refuse to question authority, ie, the flag-waving patriots.

At the other extreme, a person will be difficult to take advantage of if he questions authority, and if he is capable to looking critically at himself, his nation, and the human race. You have to accept the unpleasant reality that the human are inherently selfish, and millions of people are suffering from mental disorders.

How do I know some much about Israel?

When I was a child I believed all the lies about how the United Nations had created Israel and how the Arabs were a violent race of humans who would not live in peace.

By the time I was about 19 I began to wonder how the United Nations could create Israel without first dealing with the Palestinian problem. I wondered what sort of conversations occurred at the United Nations. My main question was:

“Where did the United Nations expect the Palestinians to live?”

I wanted to read a few of the transcripts of the discussions at the United Nations to see what they were thinking. So I went to the library to look in the newspapers of the 1940's. I was aware that newspapers were not a good source of information, but all I wanted to do was get an idea of what the United Nations was thinking when they created Israel.

Because the creation of a nation is a serious matter I assumed that the United Nations spent at least a couple of years discussing the issue before coming to a final conclusion in 1947. So I assumed that I would have to look in the newspapers several years before 1947 in order to get in on the early conversations.

I looked for “Israel” in the index of the newspapers of the early 1940's and discovered there are no entries. The index directed me to the words “Zionism” and “Palestine”. What is “Zionism”, I asked myself. I may have learned a bit about Zionism in high school but, if so, I had forgotten about it.

I thought I was going to make a quick trip to the library, but it turned out that I had to come back again and again in order to figure out what was going on. Everything I knew about Israel was a lie. These were not innocent mistakes; rather, this was outright deception; a scam; a con job.

After a few trips to the library, I became an expert on Israel. Actually, I became an expert only compared to other white Americans, most of whom know nothing about Israel. I have since discovered that most Arabs and Iranians know a lot more about the Middle East.

Do I have a bad attitude?

In 1991 I thought my opinion of America was as low as it could get. I was wrong.

President Bush announced his desire to bomb Iraq in 1991. I was certain that the majority of Americans would resist. I was expecting Americans to discuss the issue of what America's role in Iraq has been during the past few decades, why Iraq would want to attack Kuwait, and how dropping bombs would solve the problem.

I was shocked to discover that at least half the nation had absolutely no desire to discuss anything. Rather, tens millions of Americans were ready to kill Iraqis without asking why. A few days earlier most of these people had no idea what Iraq was.

I was also shocked at the way rumors were being passed around. For example, one person told me that Saddam killed his parents when he was about 12 years old. Is that true? Maybe it is true, but at least half the nation was passing these rumors around with no concern for whether they were true.

I would have been impressed if my fellow Americans had shown an interest in discussing the problems in the Middle East, and if they had demanded supporting evidence for the rumors. But instead of being impressed, I watched tens of millions of Americans behave like brainless, violent morons.

Then, when the bombing of Iraq started, the TV reporters discussed it as if we were in a Beavis and Butthead cartoon. For example, I saw them ask 10 year-old children for their opinions on the war.

The opinion of a 10 year-old child on the bombing of Iraq is not news! Rather, it is a method to distract the American people from the fact that they were slaughtering people at an outrageous cost.

I also heard one of the TV reporters referring to the flashes of light from the anti-aircraft guns as being like a fireworks display. The bombing was treated as if it was family entertainment.

I do not have a television set, so I only get glimpses of TV news at other people's homes. I wonder how shocked and appalled I would be if I had a TV set and had seen all of the coverage.

I also found myself wondering what the Arabs would think of Americans if they were to see the American TV news reports.

Americans want entertainment, not serious news

American news reporters are not under pressure to provide serious, intellectual reports. Rather, they are under pressure to be the first to report about Elizabeth Taylor's latest marriage and Bill Clinton's latest sexual escapades.

The reporters do not compete with each other to provide the most intelligent analysis of the world events; rather, they struggle to be the first to discover the most bizarre crime or the most sexually titillating Hollywood gossip.

Anybody who wants a difference of opinion or some intelligent news has to search the Internet. You, who are reading this, are in a very small minority.

Do you think I am exaggerating? Take a look at the statistics on web page accesses. Pages like this are lucky to get a hundred visitors per day; entertainment sites (such as http://www.stileproject.com/) get thousands or millions of visitors per day.

Also, notice how many email messages contain jokes or links to entertainment sites, and how seldom they contain links to serious information.

What about all the TV news shows and news magazines?

Most Americans do not watch TV news to learn about the world; rather, they are simply looking for emotional titillation.

What if you were a TV news reporter?

You then put a few weeks into writing another intelligent news report. This time you discover that the American people turn the channel to hear about Bill Clinton's latest sexual antics.

How many of intelligent news reports would you have to write before it occurred to you that the American people are not interested in serious news reports? How many of these reports would you have to write before you lost respect for the American people?

All evidence must be destroyed

Marvin: Irving, how can we get away with destroying the World Trade Centers? The Arabs might figure out that we put explosives in the buildings. Then they may realize that we must have been spying on them, and then they may start looking for our hidden microphones and video cameras. They could expose us!

Irving: Marvin! Where were you in 1991? Didn't you watch us as we completely controlled the American media during that war? Didn't you notice how we manipulated the American people into hating the Iraqis?

All of our hidden microphones and cameras are in Afghanistan. All we have to do it is convince the Americans to drop billions of dollars worth of bombs on Afghanistan. We destroyed Iraq, and we can destroy Afghanistan. We may even refer to Osama as “the Hitler of Saudi Arabia.”

Marvin: But Irving, this is a different situation. If we destroy the Taliban the Northern Alliance and the Russians will be able to get control. The Americans would never accept that. Americans spent billions of dollars in the 1980's helping Osama defeat the Northern Alliance.

Irving: Marvin, how many Americans know that?

Look; as soon as we destroy the towers, Osama will be blamed. Our friends in the television industry have agreed to saturate America with reports about how horrible the Arabs are and how terrible this crime is. They will run these reports 24 hours a day, for seven days, without interruptions so that nothing distracts the morons. This will be the greatest manipulation job we have ever done.

We will make the Americans hate Osama and the Taliban. Then we turn the wild dogs loose and watch them attack the Arabs.

Marvin: But what about the citizens in America who may figure it out, and then create web sites that expose us?

Irving: There are already lots of sites that expose lots of scams, such as the JFK killing. And look how many people have exposed George Bush as an alcoholic, unskilled coke-head moron who was born into wealth. The USA is a nation of patriotic losers who refuse to look critically at themselves! So relax, OK? We control America.

A few hamsters may have to lose their heads

There could be a few Jews who would be appalled to discover that other Jews destroyed the World Trade Centers. How do the Jews keep each other quiet? Here is one possible conversation.

Marvin: You mean to tell me that Jews were responsible! Jews turned on America and killed all those people? This is disgusting! You are justifying what the Nazis did to us! I wouldn't be surprised if the world brings back the gas chambers and finishes the job the Nazis started!

Irving: That is why you are not going to talk about it. It doesn't matter why it was done. It is over. We can't take it back. It was a big mistake, and I deeply regret it. My heart is heavy with sadness as I think of all the dead people. Oh, if only we could go back in time and realize our foolishness. We never should have considered such a diabolical plan. I often hate myself and my fellow Jews. I wonder if perhaps we deserve the Nazis. What could possibly have gotten into us? How could we possibly have behaved in such an atrocious manner?

Well, Marvin, whatever got into us, it is over with. Now we must move on and be quiet about the past, or we will be doomed to repeat it.

Marvin, do you know what this photograph shows?

Marvin: Of course! A Nazi gas chamber!

Irving: Well, Marvin, these gas chambers will be back in operation if anyone talks. Let me show you what they do.

(He picks up a live hamster and twists its head off, slow enough so that the hamster squeals for several seconds.)

Do you want to end up like this hamster, Marvin? If not, then you will do what you can to keep reports out of the news that expose what we did. You will do what you can to direct anger towards the Arabs and encourage pity of Jews.

Now, when was the last time you wrote about the Holocaust? Don't you think it's time you brought that subject up again?

Was my speculation too boring for you?

The setting is a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan in January of 2001. A group of Arabs are eating lunch. There is a Jew at this training camp who is trying to become a friend of the Arabs. He is an Israeli spy, trying to infiltrate the Arabs network. He admitted that he is a Jew, but he told the Arabs and they need not worry because he wants to help the Arabs.

Your first thought is that the Arab terrorists would never accept a Jew as a friend, no matter what the Jew says. But let's listen to these two Arabs talk as they eat their lunch to understand how this Jew figured out how to get the Arabs to accept him.

Basem: What are you doing bringing this Jew into our training camp? Are you crazy?

Yana: But Irving is on our side! For example, he was the person who gave us the information about when the USS Cole would be refueling in Yemen! How would any of us have been able to figure that out?

He and his friends are spying on America for us; he is helping us fight the Americans! This Jew has killed more Americans than you and me put together! This Jew is our friend! This aint no ordinary Jew! I love and trust Irving as if he were my brother!

Basem: I still can't believe it. For the love of Moses, he is a Jew!

Yana: How many Americans does he have to kill before you realize he is on our side? And consider his latest brilliant proposal. He suggests that we fly some planes into the World Trade Centers, the Pentagon, and the US Capitol! What sort of Jew would devise such a brilliant stunt? And his American friends will help us accomplish it! He has committed his life to driving the Americans out of the Middle East!

Irving has done more to help us than any group of Arabs ever has! He has exposed many CIA agents who were spying on us, and I saw him kill many of those agents myself! He is protecting us from the CIA; he will not let the CIA get into the same village as us! And he is always sweeping our area for microphones and video cameras to make sure the CIA is not spying on us. And his friends in America will protect us from the FBI when go over there to do this job. Hitler was wrong; there are some good, decent Jews in this world!

Is Israel really our friend?

However, look at history. Israel has never been our friend. Israel has never been anybody's friend.

Can you handle more?

Try this:

Are Americans too proud to consider the possibility of a scam?