Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | BlueHost Review

Why Were No Vehicles Blown Off
The Freeway By The Jets Blast?

Have a look at the following animated graphic of what happens when an automobile gets too close to the wake from an aircrafts jet engines.




This is from a video hosted by Dave McGowan. The video itself can be downloaded from

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/simulation.mpeg (local copy).

This illustrates what happens when an automobile gets too close to the wake from an aircrafts jet engines. Here, the engines are powered to only a little above idle (one knows this, because the 747 remains stationary). Of course, under increased power the engines are capable of doing significantly more damage, than that seen in the video.

Now, the aircraft that hit the Pentagon, crossed a freeway (Washington Blvd - Highway 27) only a few feet above the multitude of cars (in fact, so close to the ground that the plane clipped a number of the light-posts alongside the freeway), so why weren't these cars blown around in similar fashion to the one in the video?

Of course, one has to take into account that the aircraft in this demonstration is a Boeing 747. A Boeing 747 has more powerful engines than a Boeing 757:

Boeing 757 -- approx 40,000 lb (120 kilonewtons) maximum thrust.
Boeing 747 -- approx 60,000 lb (180 kilonewtons) maximum thrust.

Also, a Boeing 747 has 4 engines and a Boeing 757 only two. However, since the vehicle would only be effected by the blast of one engine at a time, the right most engine in this case, the comparison is reasonable.

According to a number of eyewitnesses, the aircraft that hit the Pentagon actually powered up its jets around this time to avoid hitting the ground. So apparently, it did not just glide over the freeway. This means that its engines were throttled on to a greater extent than that of the stationary 747 in the demonstration. This means that the cars on the freeway should have been blown around significantly. Why did this not happen?

Here are some photos of a light-post that was struck by the aircraft as it passed over the freeway. The light-post fell on the taxi (pictured in both photos). The Pentagon can be seen burning in the background of the first photo.




In about April of 2002, this article challenged the Bush administration to present the aircraft debris collected at the Pentagon to the world, so that the world would be convinced that the aircraft that hit the Pentagon was indeed a Boeing 757, as claimed.

It seemed that this would be a simple way to put to rest the conspiracy theories surrounding the incident.

However, the Bush administration has refused to simply show the world the aircraft debris and prove that they were not in any way involved.

Understand exactly what has transpired: the Bush administration has a simple and full-proof way of proving that they were not in any way involved in organizing the Pentagon attack, yet for over two years they have refused to present the world the evidence (that they claim to have in their possession) that would clear them.

So why has the government not put to rest all the "conspiracy theories"? The answer is clearly that presenting the debris would prove the conspiracy theorists correct in their belief that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Clearly, the debris would prove that flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, otherwise the Bush administration would have released the debris immediately.

The refusal of the government to release the aircraft debris is solid evidence that the government is lying about flight 77. And if the government is lying about flight 77, then it is also lying about all of the events on 9/11.